Archive for December, 2007

Hillary says electing her will cause oil prices to drop

Sunday, December 23rd, 2007

WTF? Has the toll of the political road made her even more touched in head? In the long list of Hillary’s wacky promises, ($5000 per child, $1000 per 401K, etc.) this one may lead the list.

“I predict to you, the oil-producing countries will drop the price of oil,” Clinton said, speaking at the Manchester YWCA. “They will once again assume, once the cost pressure is off, Americans and our political process will recede.”
Clinton argued that former President Jimmy Carter in the late 1970s actually started moving in the right direction toward energy independence, but his successor, Ronald Reagan, “dismantled” that work. Source

Again we say, WTF? Not only is she lying to the american people (again) she obviously is to stupid to understand economics. Maybe some of her advisors should explain it to her.
And as for the rest of it; Carter was moving things in the right direction? Reagan made it worse? Doesn’t she read any history at all? Carter’s ineptitude and lack of action caused the crisis to develop to near unmanageable proportions. His oh so fabulous “diplomacy” skills, you know the ones that he always says President Bush lacks, failed. Again. Just as they failed in every other aspect of his Presidency (but that is a story for someone else’s blog). It was, in fact, President Reagan’s mandate to cut price controls that brought the crisis to an end!
And yet, you people still seem to want to elect her. Don’t you?

Bill Clinton is already planning his 2nd presidency

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

And he’s started by volunteering President Bush 41! We’re pretty sure he didn’t check with Bush 41 about this.

Former President Bill Clinton said Monday that the first thing his wife Hillary will do when she reaches the White House is dispatch him and his predecessor, President George H.W. Bush, on an around-the-world mission to repair the damage done to America’s reputation by the current president — Bush’s son, George W. Bush.

“Well, the first thing she intends to do, because you can do this without passing a bill, the first thing she intends to do is to send me and former President Bush and a number of other people around the world to tell them that America is open for business and cooperation again,” Clinton said in response to a question from a supporter about what his wife’s “number one priority” would be as president. Source

Does anybody think that Bush 41 will be willing to trot the globe trashing his son’s actions as president? What is Bubba thinking?
If Hillary is elected, then the country better be prepared for all sorts of questions regarding who’s really in charge. It’s so nice that Bubba is telling the American people exactly what his wife’s first action would be as President. Is this what America needs right now, a two headed beast fighting over who’s really in charge?

Hillary vs Obama - The Black Ops begin

Thursday, December 13th, 2007

WOW! Talk about political sidestepping. Not only has the Clinton campaign raised the issue of Obama’s drug use right before the Iowa caucus, but they are preemptively blaming the Republicans in advance!

Shaheen, an attorney and veteran organizer, said much of Obama’s background is unknown and could be a problem in November 2008 if he is the Democratic nominee. He said Republicans would work hard to discover new aspects of Obama’s admittedly spotty youth.
“It’ll be, ‘When was the last time? Did you ever give drugs to anyone? Did you sell them to anyone?’” said Shaheen, whose wife, Jeanne, is the state’s former governor and is running for the U.S. Senate next year.
“There are so many openings for Republican dirty tricks. It’s hard to overcome,” Shaheen said.
Clinton’s campaign said it had nothing to do with his comments, and Shaheen said later he regretted them.Source

The latest attack on Obama from the Hillary Clinton camp is a classic example of the Clinton’s adherence to the theory of “plausible deniability”. For those of you unfamiliar with the term:

Plausible deniability is the term given to the creation of loose and informal chains of command in governments and other large organizations. In the case that assassinations, false flag or black ops or any other illegal or otherwise disreputable and unpopular activities become public, high-ranking officials may deny any connection to or awareness of such act, or the agents used to carry out such act.

In politics and espionage, deniability refers to the ability of a “powerful player” or actor to avoid “blowback” by secretly arranging for an action to be taken on their behalf by a third party—ostensibly unconnected with the major player.
Source

Yet again, a low level staffer takes the fall, the information gets out, and Hillary says she’s not responsible. This is the person you want to run this country? When are the Democrats going to wake up to the fact that this woman is waaaaay more dangerous than any Republican?

Are the Liberals out to get Hillary?

Monday, December 3rd, 2007

As we’ve stated before, the far Left doesn’t like Hillary. That’s obvious. Even though she’s a Socialist wolf in a Moderate Democratic sheep’s wool, the far Left see’s her as dangerous. Why? because they remember Slick Willie, and the promises he left unfullfilled. Sure, he made casual sex cool again, but he failed to deliver what the far left wanted most: more secular legislation. Now with Hillary’s impending nomination, the far Left is visibly turning on Hillary and running a negative ad. It’s hard to believe that the VRWc and the far Left agree, but we do - ANYBODY BUT HILLARY IN ‘08!!!

Liberal activists plan to begin airing a television ad against Hillary Rodham Clinton in Iowa this week, the first non-Republican negative ad aimed at a Democratic presidential candidate.
The group, Democratic Courage, has accused Clinton of making policy decisions on the basis of polls, not convictions. It planned to introduce the ad Tuesday.

Glenn Hurowitz, the group’s president, described the spot as a modest buy that would run on cable only, meaning it won’t be seen as much as ads by Clinton and rival Barack Obama, who are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on ads in the state.Source