Just Say No To Hillary Clinton

Yes, you heard it correctly. With the US population soaring over the 300 million mark, the tide of illegals swelling through the boarder, and a social services network on the brink of collapse, Hillary knows exactly what to do: encourage more bodies into the overflowing pot. And just how is she going to accomplish this feat? By giving a $5,000 bond to each child born. That’s $20 Billion dollars due at maturity given the estimate of 4 million children born each year.
Of course, she has no idea how to pay for it. But we know how she’ll do it; she’ll raise taxes! So, you’ll be paying more taxes to fund the “free” bond you think you child will be getting. Let’s just say you spend $300 more per year in taxes because of All of Hillary’s proposed tax increases. After 18 years when the bond matures, you will have paid $5400 in extra taxes. That’s $400 more than if you’d bought the bond at full face value to begin with! Can people really be this stupid to believe the crap that comes out of her mouth?
And what of all the children born before the “free” $5,000 bond law is enacted? Shouldn’t they be entitled to free money for their future? Sounds like age discrimination to us. We can just picture that lawsuit going to the Supreme court in 2010!
Now we all know what this is. This is a bullshit pre-election promise to entice poor people to vote for her. It’s utter crap. It will never happen. No way. No how. But to many people are just gullible enough to fall for it.

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday that every child born in the United States should get a $5,000 “baby bond” from the government to help pay for future costs of college or buying a home.
Clinton, her party’s front-runner in the 2008 race, made the suggestion during a forum hosted by the Congressional Black Caucus.

“I like the idea of giving every baby born in America a $5,000 account that will grow over time, so that when that young person turns 18 if they have finished high school they will be able to access it to go to college or maybe they will be able to make that downpayment on their first home,” she said.

The New York senator did not offer any estimate of the total cost of such a program or how she would pay for it. Approximately 4 million babies are born each year in the United States.
Source

Contrary to all the stories out on the web today, Hillary did not say “I’m not a lesbian”. Here’s the exact quote in question:

According to the NY Daily News, in an interview with the magazine’s news and features editor Sean Kennedy to be published next week, the editor asks, “How do you respond to the occasional rumor that you’re a lesbian?”

“People say a lot of things about me, so I really don’t pay any attention to it,” Clinton remarked. “It’s not true, but it is something that I have no control over. People will say what they want to say.”
source

What she said in that quote that leads people to jump to conclusions is the line “It’s not true”. But what is the “It” she is talking about? We all remember Bill Clinton’s famous deposition testamony:

“It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is. If the–if he–if ‘is’ means is and never has been, that is not–that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement….Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true.”
source

So is Hillary parsing “it” in her brain when she says “It’s not true”? Is she saying that at the moment she was being interviewed she isn’t a lesbian, or is she saying she’s never had any lesbian experiences? Maybe she considers herself a bisexual, so the label of lesbian doesn’t refer to her. Why everyone is rushing to believe this woman is beyond our comprehension. The rumors about her past have been there for years. You know the old adage, “Where’s there’s smoke, there’s usually fire”.

Don’t believe that she’d be stupid enough to go on record with this? Then Click Here to see the proof. At least Obama and Biden were “smart enough” to chicken out and not vote. Good God people, do you realize that by voting against this condemnation Hillary Clinton has slapped the entire military in the face? How can she expect to be Commander in Chief if she bows to pressure from a political organization that uses intimidation and name calling as their chief weapons?

In her first step towards Socializing the American health industry, and formulating a European style big bureaucratic nightmare, Hillary Clinton today proposed a $110 billion mandatory health insurance plan. That’s right, mandatory! You see Mommy believes that you don’t know any better. She also believes that the government should force you to pay for other people’s health insurance. How? By mandating that the insurance companies cover everybody, and that means higher premiums for the rest of us, so the companies can provide coverage to the indigents and illegals as well as the deserving. Oh, and she’s also planning on repealing the tax cuts. So if you happen to be fortunate enough to be making a decent living, be warned, you will soon be paying more taxes.
The best quote we saw on this came from the Giuliani campaign:

“If you liked Michael Moore’s ‘Sicko,’ you’re going to love HillaryCare 2.0,” said the Giuliani statement. “Senator Clinton’s latest health scheme includes more government mandates, expensive federal subsidies and more big bureaucracy — in short, a prescription for an increase in wait times, a decrease in patient care and tax hikes to pay for it all.”

You can read the liberal media’s take on it, and read how she tries to spin it all over at cnn.com if you like. But do not be fooled by the spin. This is the first step towards an out an out Socialized medicine that will destroy health care in this country forever!

Why else would she make a statement like this to General Petraeus?

“Despite what I view is your rather extraordinary efforts in your testimony both yesterday and today,” said Clinton, “I think that the reports that you provide to us really require a willing suspension of disbelief.”

How much hubris must one have to challenge a General of Petraeus’ standing and knowledge? It’s blatantly obvious that Hill has become a participant in MoveOn’s blackmail scheme. Why else would she refrain from supporting Senator Cornyn’s resolution condemning MoveOn’s slanderous ad in the New York Slimes? She and the rest of the Democan’ts refused to support the measure, and it failed to come up for a binding vote. If it had, then there would have been more of a record of this shameless act by Hillary and her thieving pals. (Just because we haven’t mentioned the whole Hsu affair, does not mean we are not aware of it )

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, introduced a Senate resolution Tuesday condemning MoveOn.org’s recent attack on Gen. David Petraeus in a New York Times advertisement. The move comes the same day the top U.S. general in Iraq is set to testify before key Senate committees.

The measure was offered as a nonbinding amendment to the transportation appropriations bill currently on the floor, and but was ruled “not germane” and will not be put to a vote.
Source

Bravo to Rudy Giuliani for slamming her in on the radio,

“Hillary Clinton, questioning Gen. (David) Petraeus, said you had to suspend disbelief,” Giuliani said after a brief campaign stop at an Akron restaurant. “Why would you say that about an American general?”

He made his point, but we think he should have gone further. Let’s hope he’s saving it for their first debate…

Or is it merely a little advance publicity stunt? That’s the question people are asking this morning. It seems that someone broke into Kathleen Willey’s rural Virginia home and stole a hard copy manuscript of her upcoming book “Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton”.

Kathleen Willey, the woman who says Bill Clinton groped her in the Oval Office, claims she was the target of an unusual house burglary over the weekend that nabbed a manuscript for her upcoming book, which promises explosive revelations that could damage Sen. Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

Willey told WND little else was taken from her rural Virginia home as she slept alone upstairs – electronics and jewelry were left behind – and she believes the Clintons were behind it.

The break-in, she said, reminded her of the widely reported incident 10 years ago in which she claimed she was threatened near the same Richmond-area home by a stranger just two days before she was to testify against President Clinton in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case.

The theft of the manuscript early Saturday morning was suspicious, she told WND, coming only days after the first mainstream media mention of her upcoming book, which is expected to include accusations of campaign finance violations and new revelations about harassment and threats by the Clintons and their associates.
Full Story