Just Say No To Hillary Clinton

It seems that the best way to handle Bubba and his philandering ways is to sidestep that whole “blowjob in the oval office” thing. Why talk about Hillary and her involvement in Whitewater? Nix on that. Stay on message.

“Will President Clinton be a drag on the campaign?”
“Of course not,” is the prescribed answer. “Americans give President Clinton very high ratings and he is one of the most respected and beloved leaders in the world.” The response is followed by highlights of the ex-president’s term in office.
Another question asks, “How do you combat Clinton fatigue, or those who say they don’t want the drama of the Clintons again?”
Answer: “A lot of Americans will gladly take the eight great years of economic prosperity and peace that the Clinton Administration delivered . . . We can do this again with experienced leaders like Hillary at the helm.”
And still another asks, “Isn’t she too polarizing to win?
Answer: “Obviously not, since she’s already winning! If you look at the polls from the past weekend, she’s ahead in both the primary and the general election races.”
Full Story

These are just some of the scripted answers The New York Post has uncovered from the Clinton campaign. So make a list, and the next time you see a Clintonista talking head on TV, see how how close to the script they stay. Maybe you could make a drinking game out of it. Say everytime one of them says “experience”, “leadership”, or “know how”, you take a drink. Bottoms Up!

We didn’t say this:

“God knows, is there anybody more ambitious than Hillary Clinton?” …

She is overproduced and overscripted. “It’s not a very big thing to say, ‘I made a mistake’ on the war, and typical of Hillary Clinton that she can’t,” Mr. Geffen says. “She’s so advised by so many smart advisers who are covering every base. I think that America was better served when the candidates were chosen in smoke-filled rooms.”…

“Marc Rich getting pardoned? An oil-profiteer expatriate who left the country rather than pay taxes or face justice?” Mr. Geffen says. “Yet another time when the Clintons were unwilling to stand for the things that they genuinely believe in. Everybody in politics lies, but they do it with such ease, it’s troubling.”

Full Story

These were all excerpted from Maureen Dowd’s interview with David Geffen. You know him, Hollywood mogul and former Clinonista. Well it seems that Obama has made him change his tune. Sweet music isn’t it?

It sure seems like she is losing some of her brilliance. Just take a look at the Hollywood heavys who are flocking to Obama.

Checks from Hollywood’s A-list stars such as George Clooney, Eddie Murphy and Barbra Streisand added up to an expected, one-night take of $1 million for Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.

Three of the entertainment industry’s biggest names _ DreamWorks studio founders Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg and David Geffen _ planned a private, Beverly Hills fundraiser for the freshman senator from Illinois.

The lineup of celebrities writing checks read like a red carpet’s who’s who _ Tom Hanks, Denzel Washington and Ben Stiller among others.
Full Story

It will be interesting to see who turns out for Hillary at her next Hollywood fundraiser…

Ah, the pandering begins, or is it continues? We’re not quite sure. Hillary Clinton today, in a move to show she is “blacker” than Barak Obama, called for the removal of the Confederate flag from the South Carolina statehouse.

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton said Monday that South Carolina should remove the Confederate flag from its Statehouse grounds, in part because the nation should unite under one banner while at war…

“I personally would like to see it removed from the Statehouse grounds,” the New York senator said during her first trip to the early voting state since announcing her White House bid.
Full Story

So all of you “white” liberal southern Democrats who happen to hold the notion of Dixie close to your heart are shit out of luck. Hillary will make sure that the image of the south lies in ruins forever by reminding you that you are inferior to a Northern Liberal who never had slaves. You like the Confederate flag? Then you must be a racist. Shame on you. Good thing Mamma Hillary is here to sort you out.

With her anouncement this morning on her website that

the redeployment should start in 90 days or the Congress will revoke authorization for this war

has Hillary Clinton made a major blunder? Why the sudden change in political strategy? Obviously the hammering she has been taking in the Liberal media (read: NY Times) is taking its toll. By making the following announcement

If George Bush doesn’t end the war before he leaves office, when I’m president, I will

she is showing a real weakness in dealing with a tough foreign policy situation, and has shown her true color. Yellow. She is also showing panic and fear. She is afraid that Iraq might still be in play in 2008. She doesn’t want to deal with it, or the heat over her vote to authorize the invasion.
In the dangerous climate we live in in today’s world, we ask, “Why would anyone consider voting for this woman?” She is a coward, and as such is unfit to lead the United States. She does not have the balls to be President.

If the they weren’t, then why would they bash her in this article?

One of the most important decisions that Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton made about her bid for the presidency came late last year when she ended a debate in her camp over whether she should repudiate her 2002 vote authorizing military action in Iraq.

Several advisers, friends and donors said in interviews that they had urged her to call her vote a mistake in order to appease antiwar Democrats, who play a critical role in the nominating process. Yet Mrs. Clinton herself, backed by another faction, never wanted to apologize — even if she viewed the war as a mistake — arguing that an apology would be a gimmick.

In the end, she settled on language that was similar to Senator John Kerry’s when he was the Democratic nominee in 2004: that if she had known in 2002 what she knows now about Iraqi weaponry, she would never have voted for the Senate resolution authorizing force.
Full article

The Times uses the “anti-war” left in the article, but clearly they are speaking for their own liberal agenda. The times is just itching to endorse Hillary Clinton in her bid for the White House. But with circulation at an all time low, they dare not risk their loyal Left wing readers by doing so. So they must wait. And wait. When the time is right, they will endorse her, but it will not be on their timetable. Hillary knows full well the chants of “Flip Flop” that await her if she changes her stance. She does not poses the subtle nuance of Bubba. So she stands her ground, and tries to save face. And in doing so, she annoys “The Old Gray Lady”.

The time has come in the campaign for candidates to begin to round up endorsements. And for the Clinton campaign, that means it time to spend a little cash.

A key black Democratic leader in South Carolina has negotiated a $10,000 per month consulting contract with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s campaign, a development that came to light when the lawmaker endorsed the presidential hopeful.

The contract with state Sen. Darrell Jackson’s firm, Sunrise Enterprises, is not yet signed but will run through the first Southern primary here next January, Clinton spokesman Mo Elleithee confirmed Thursday.
Full Story

But it’s okay. It’s not payola. And it’s not against campaign ethics rules. Why? Because she’s a Democrat. Don’t forget the double standard that exists. If this was a Republican candidate, you can be sure that the Liberal media would be screaming about this. Chris Matthews would be spitting at the TV screen, and the whole Democratic machine that run MSNBC would be running this story in their headlines. But they’re not. Whatever the anointed one wants, the media is happy to give her.

That’s a very good question. And there are numerous others that surround the senior thesis of Hillary Rodham when she was at Wellesley College. It’s long been know that she wrote her thesis on poverty. It’s also well known that she based a considerable amount of her thesis on Saul Alinsky. Who was Saul Alinksy? He was the radical author whose 2 best known works Reveille for Radicals and Rules for Radicals are must reading for the far left.
So why are we asking these questions now? Well, The Republican Spectacular has done a splash story on how Hillary’s thesis has become available again. And in it they quote some pretty inflammatory stuff as well as detail the process by which the manuscript has been sealed or “missing” all these years.

Her paper earned an “A” and - when she graduated - it was shipped off to the archives.

But it was sealed in the nineties when reporters - looking for a scoop on Mrs. Clinton - came knocking at Wellesley.

The hunt for the missing thesis began….

Why, in the world, was it sealed?

Maybe it undermined President Clinton.

He proposed the same community-based programs in 1993 that Mrs. Clinton had railed against in 1969.

Or maybe it was perceived - by some in her cadre - as un-American. Full Story

It would have been nice for them to have posted the entire thesis on line for all to read, but the article is definitely worth a reading.
If anyone knows where a copy of Hillary’s thesis resides online, please let us know so we can read the whole thing, and post a link to it.

Were they separated at birth? We shall soon find out. You can bet that the Clinton camp will be watching this election with great interest. Pay particularly close attention to Ségolène’s 100 points for France. See how many of them sound like the proposals that Hillary is putting forward.

As if to preempt her opponents on the right, she stressed throughout her speech that her ideas had been nourished in 6,000 debates with citizens throughout France, a method she has called “participative democracy.”

“With me, politics will never again happen without you,” a combative Royal, 53, told the crowd of flag-waving supporters wearing her logo on T-shirts and stickers. “Today I offer you a presidential pact: 100 proposals for France to rediscover a shared ambition, pride and fraternity.”
Full Story

You can’t say that we here at “Just Say No To Hillary Clinton” are the only ones who feel that Hillary Clinton is a disingenuous person. Even Ralph Nader has noticed her propensity to say “whatever and whenever” to please a particular focus or special interest group.

Nader said he did not plan to vote for Clinton, a Democratic senator from New York and former first lady.

“I don’t think she has the fortitude. Actually she’s really a panderer and a flatterer. As she goes around the country, you’ll see more of that,” Nader said.
Full Story

Now if only the rest of the country would begin to se the light like Mr. Nader…..