Just Say No To Hillary Clinton

Hillary came out to try and defend her husband’s inept effort to protect the U.S. from terrorism and UBL. Hillary stood tall for her man, and defended his actions. Now where have we heard say things like this before? Hmmmmmm….let’s see….Oh Yeah, here we go:

“I do believe that this is a battle,” the first lady said.

“Look at the very people who are involved in this. They have popped up in other settings. The great story here for anybody willing to find it, write about it and explain it is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president,” Mrs. Clinton said.

The first lady called the sex and perjury allegations swirling around her husband part of an effort “to undo the results of two elections.”Source

Well we all know how that little Monica Lewinsky thing turned out don’t we Hillary?

So let’s come back to the present, and Hillary’s comments today.

“I think my husband did a great job in demonstrating that Democrats are not going to take these attacks,” Hillary Clinton said. “I’m certain that if my husband and his national security team had been shown a classified report entitled ‘Bin Laden Determined To Attack Inside the United States’ he would have taken it more seriously than history suggests it was taken by our current president and his national security team.”
Source

Okay, let’s review the truth shall we Hillary? Let’s see exactly what your husband said on Fox News:

Bill Clinton on Fox News Sunday:

And you ask me about terror and Al Qaeda with that sort of dismissive thing? When all you have to do is read Richard Clarke’s book to look at what we did in a comprehensive, systematic way to try to protect the country against terror.
Source

The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon The United States - Richard Clarke - March 24, 2004

Despite our inability to locate Usama bin Ladin in one place long enough to launch an attack, I urged that we engage in a bombing campaign of al Qida facilities in Afghanistan. That option was deferred by the Principals Committee. Source

Transcript: Wednesday’s 9/11 Commission Hearings
FDCH E-Media
Wednesday, March 24, 2004; 7:00 PM

GORTON: In August of 1998, did you recommend a longer-lasting military response or just precisely the one that, in fact, took place?
CLARKE: I recommended a series of rolling attacks against the infrastructure in Afghanistan. Every time they would rebuild it, I proposed that we blow it up again much like, in fact, we were doing in Iraq, where we had a rolling series of attacks on their air defense system.
Gorton: And shortly after that, you came up with the so-called Delenda Plan, as I understand it. And is our staff report accurate in saying that it had four principle approaches — diplomacy, covert action, various financial members and military action? Is that a reasonable summary?
CLARKE: Yes, sir.
GORTON: Also, is our staff accurate in saying that the strategy was never formally adopted, but that you were authorized in effect to go ahead with the first three, but not with the fourth?
CLARKE: Yes, sir.
GORTON: And at various times thereafter you did recommend specific military responses under specific circumstances, did you not?
CLARKE: Yes, sir.
GORTON: Each of which was rejected for one reason or another?
CLARKE: That’s correct.
Source

Using lies to defend your husband’s lies? WRONG then Hillary! WRONG now!

But we do thank you for giving birth to the VRWC on January 27th, 1998.

Some things just make us laugh, and this story is one them.

The Rev. Jerry Falwell acknowledged on Sunday saying that if Hillary Rodham Clinton were the Democrats’ presidential nominee in 2008, it would motivate conservative evangelical Christians to oppose her more than if the devil himself were running.

Falwell said in a telephone interview that his comments to several hundred pastors and religious activists at the “Value Voter Summit” conference were “totally tongue-in-cheek.”

“I certainly hope that Hillary is the candidate,” Falwell said at a breakfast session Friday in Washington. “I hope she’s the candidate, because nothing will energize my (constituency) like Hillary Clinton,” he said. “If Lucifer ran, he wouldn’t.”

Full Story

This was sent to us by Peter Paul over at HillCap. It’s published in today’s Worl Net Daily. It’s a very good read, and shed’s even more light on the shady practices of the people that Hillary & Bill Clinton surround themselves with.

Bill Clinton’s longtime attorney David Kendall is accused of filing a fabricated statement in a court brief to quash a multi-million-dollar lawsuit against the former president.

In legal pleadings filed this week with Los Angeles Superior Court, business mogul Peter Franklin Paul claims Kendall cobbled together two unrelated quotes from a March 2005 federal court hearing in an attempt to pin on Paul the very charge Paul is making against Clinton.

Full Story

Since the title of this blog is “Just Say No To Hillary Clinton”, we feel it is only appropriate to endorse John Spencer for U.S. Senate. Hillary Clinton just assumes that she can walk into the White House via the U.S. Senate seat from New York. But not if YOU do not want her to. John Spencer is the former mayor of Yonkers, NY, a veteran of The U.S. Army, and a principled Conservative leader. He will be a FULL TIME Senator, not a part time resident who’s running a full time Presidential campaign. We believe that the people of New York deserve a full time Senator. Everybody knows that Hillary Clinton only cares about New York if it helps her true political ambitions. Support John Spencer, and help derail the Hillary Clinton political machine!
For more info visit http://www.spencerforsenate.com/

It’s come to our attention that Hillary Clinton has refused to debate John Spencer in prime time and on network television. Why? What is she hiding? It seems that her people think 2 debates (one on local cable NY1 in NYC, and another at 9 a.m. on a Sunday) are sufficient. we don’t. For a U.S. Senate seat as powerful as the one from New York, there should definitely be a debate in prime time on network television. Then maybe Hillary might finally have to answer the question about running for President instead of serving her constituents. Who are we kidding? We’ll bet you a nickel to a dollar she avoids answering the question.

Never let it be said we never say anything nice about Hillary Clinton. Kudos to Mrs. Clinton for standing up up and speaking out against this despicable film.

Sen. Hillary Clinton this morning blasted the producers of a new film depicting the assassination of Pres. George W. Bush.

“I think it’s despicable,” Clinton said of “Death of a President,” a fictional film that features a staged assassination of the president in 2007. “I think it’s absolutely outrageous. That anyone would even attempt to profit on such a horrible scenario makes me sick.”
Full Story

We hope Tasini’s people didn’t place any actual bets on an upset. And it looks like nobody in New York really cared anyway. Analysts say that less than 12% of registered Democrats voted. Less than 12%? Pathetic doesn’t even begin to describe that turnout. If we had a vomiting smiley, we’d insert it here!

U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton overwhelmed her opponent in the New York Democratic primary Tuesday.

With 95 percent of the vote in, the former first lady was leading challenger Jonathan Tasini, 83.2 percent to 16.8 percent, The New York Times said.
Full Story

She says it’s for the NY Senate campaign. Yeah right. And I bet she has another bridge she wants to sell. She has NO competition for her Senate seat. None. She will win along party lines with probably 60% of the vote. So where is the money really going to go? For her Presidential run that she’s not talking about making, even though everybody knows she’s going to? Where do you think?

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York is the most prolific fundraiser in Congress, far outpacing other lawmakers by collecting $44.9 million over the past six years for her campaign to win a second Senate term, new government reports show.
This is twice the amount raised by the No. 2 fundraiser, Sen. Charles E. Schumer, the other New York Democrat from New York and no slouch in that department.
Full Story

According to reports, that’s what Karl Rove and his staff tried to do before they took over her old White House office. Now, we are not saying these reports are true. In fact, it makes us laugh at the thought of it. So we merely share it with you for a good laugh as we head towards the weekend.

Karl Rove says he’s not The Exorcist.

Rove, the Bush political shaman Democrats love to demonize, enlisted a trio of clergymen to exorcise Hillary Rodham Clinton’s left-wing spirit when he moved into her West Wing office in 2001, according to an unflattering new biography.

“I talked to Karl; he said it’s not true and, beyond that, he will have no comment,” White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said.

Clinton smiled and shook her head in disbelief Wednesday when asked about the tale, which appears in “The Architect: Karl Rove and the Master Plan for Absolute Power,” by James Moore and Wayne Slater.
Full Story

Don’t believe it. Nope. Not for a second. It’s one of two things:
A) It’s a red herring designed to shore up her support in New York. Why you ask? Because, if she wins New York by a landslide, then she’ll be able to say to the Dems around primary time, “See, I am electable!”
or
B) It’s silly foreign Libs trying to inject their useless point of view into our political system.

Either way, we don’t buy this piece of foreign fluff. This is a crock story spread by a bunch of Brits with their heads up their arses!

FRIENDS of Hillary Clinton have been whispering the unthinkable. Despite her status as the runaway frontrunner for the 2008 Democratic nomination for president, some of her closest advisers say she might opt out of the White House race and seek to lead her party in the Senate.
The former first lady longs to return to the White House with husband Bill as consort. Only last week she told television viewers America would be led by a woman one day. “Stay tuned,” she said.

First, however, she has to win the election. Some Democratic party elders — the American equivalent of the Tories’ “men in grey suits” — say Clinton may back out of the race of her own volition.

“I would not be surprised if she were to decide that the best contribution she can make to her country is to forget about being president and become a consensus-maker in the Senate,” said a leading Democratic party insider. “She believes there is no trust between the two political sides and that we can’t function as a democracy without it.”
Full piece of Crap!