Just Say No To Hillary Clinton

In the latest sign Hillary Clinton isn’t yet preparing to bow out of the presidential race, the New York senator is launching a new television ad Monday that highlights her claim she is beating Barack Obama in the popular vote.

The spot is set to run in the remaining two primary states — Montana and South Dakota — and argues Clinton has won “more votes than anyone in the history of the Democratic primaries.”
Source

Okay, she won Puerto Rico, but what does that mean? Puerto Ricans can not vote in the general election (yeah we know, that’s a whole other screwed up story) so their vote on Sunday means nothing. Hillary’s whole claim that she won the popular vote is based on Michigan and Florida. Both states violated the DNC rules. The primaries were flawed from the start. So the popular vote can’t be counted as reliable. Since they(the states and the DNC) refused to redo the primaries, the votes should not count. Hillary does not then have the popular vote. Will somebody please have the fat lady Oprah sit on Hillary and start singing?

Thanks to Mike for sending this to us. We don’t agree with Obama, but we think you know our position though:

WOW! Talk about political sidestepping. Not only has the Clinton campaign raised the issue of Obama’s drug use right before the Iowa caucus, but they are preemptively blaming the Republicans in advance!

Shaheen, an attorney and veteran organizer, said much of Obama’s background is unknown and could be a problem in November 2008 if he is the Democratic nominee. He said Republicans would work hard to discover new aspects of Obama’s admittedly spotty youth.
“It’ll be, ‘When was the last time? Did you ever give drugs to anyone? Did you sell them to anyone?’” said Shaheen, whose wife, Jeanne, is the state’s former governor and is running for the U.S. Senate next year.
“There are so many openings for Republican dirty tricks. It’s hard to overcome,” Shaheen said.
Clinton’s campaign said it had nothing to do with his comments, and Shaheen said later he regretted them.Source

The latest attack on Obama from the Hillary Clinton camp is a classic example of the Clinton’s adherence to the theory of “plausible deniability”. For those of you unfamiliar with the term:

Plausible deniability is the term given to the creation of loose and informal chains of command in governments and other large organizations. In the case that assassinations, false flag or black ops or any other illegal or otherwise disreputable and unpopular activities become public, high-ranking officials may deny any connection to or awareness of such act, or the agents used to carry out such act.

In politics and espionage, deniability refers to the ability of a “powerful player” or actor to avoid “blowback” by secretly arranging for an action to be taken on their behalf by a third party—ostensibly unconnected with the major player.
Source

Yet again, a low level staffer takes the fall, the information gets out, and Hillary says she’s not responsible. This is the person you want to run this country? When are the Democrats going to wake up to the fact that this woman is waaaaay more dangerous than any Republican?