Just Say No To Hillary Clinton

That’s not really a big surprise, now is it? The last thing Hillary and her ventriloquist dummy Bill want is for a light to be shown on their past.

Democratic frontrunner Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., has been taking heat from her Democratic and Republican opponents for the reams of papers detailing her various activities as First Lady that the National Archives has yet to release from the William Jefferson Clinton Presidential Library.

And now questions are being raised about why another set of papers relevant to her political career at yet another Arkansas library will not be available to the public until well after election day 2008, despite earlier indications that the papers would have been released by now.
Source

Or is it merely a little advance publicity stunt? That’s the question people are asking this morning. It seems that someone broke into Kathleen Willey’s rural Virginia home and stole a hard copy manuscript of her upcoming book “Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton”.

Kathleen Willey, the woman who says Bill Clinton groped her in the Oval Office, claims she was the target of an unusual house burglary over the weekend that nabbed a manuscript for her upcoming book, which promises explosive revelations that could damage Sen. Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

Willey told WND little else was taken from her rural Virginia home as she slept alone upstairs – electronics and jewelry were left behind – and she believes the Clintons were behind it.

The break-in, she said, reminded her of the widely reported incident 10 years ago in which she claimed she was threatened near the same Richmond-area home by a stranger just two days before she was to testify against President Clinton in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case.

The theft of the manuscript early Saturday morning was suspicious, she told WND, coming only days after the first mainstream media mention of her upcoming book, which is expected to include accusations of campaign finance violations and new revelations about harassment and threats by the Clintons and their associates.
Full Story

A friend over at ConservaBabes told us about these. They’re pretty funny, so we decided to share. Enjoy!

The 10 Stupidest Things Hillary Clinton Has Ever Said

10. “I have to confess that it’s crossed my mind that you could not be a Republican and a Christian.”

9. “God bless the America we are trying to create.”

8. “We have a lot of kids who don’t know what works means. They think work is a four-letter word.”

7. “He ran a gas station down in St. Louis… No, Mahatma Gandhi was a great leader of the 20th century.” –introducing a quote by Mahatma Gandhi

6. “Who is going to find out? These women are trash. Nobody’s going to believe them.” –on Bill Clinton’s bimbo eruptions

5. “If I didn’t kick his ass every day, he wouldn’t be worth anything.” –on Bill Clinton

4. “I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas, but what I decided to do was to fulfill my profession which I entered before my husband was in public life.”

3. “We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”

2. “I have said that I’m not running and I’m having a great time being pres — being a first-term senator.” —on her presidential ambitions

1. “I’m not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers. We are the president.”
source

Judicial Watch has filed a lawsuit against The Clinton Library trying to obtain access to Hillary Clinton’s daily schedules from her White House days. Why is this news worthy? Because the Clintonistas have been less than forthcoming with the release of her actual activity while Bubba was in the Oval Office. We all know what he was doing, but what was she really up to?

udicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption announced today that it filed a lawsuit on July 16, 2007 in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration to obtain access to the following records from the Clinton Presidential Library: “First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton’s calendar, to include but not limited to her daily office diary, schedule, day planner, telephone log book, and chronological file.” The Archives, which operates and maintains Clinton Presidential Library records, failed to respond to Judicial Watch’s April 5, 2006 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

Full Story

The left wing media, and the potential Democratic suitors to the White House have been up in arms over the Justice Department firings of 8 attorneys. Stop the presses. Hold the phones! This is a scandal that’s brewing. Just ask Hillary Clinton:

March 13, 2007 — In an exclusive interview to air Wednesday morning, March 14, on “Good Morning America,” Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination, for the first time called for the resignation of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

“The buck should stop somewhere,” Clinton told ABC News senior political correspondent Jake Tapper, “and the attorney general — who still seems to confuse his prior role as the president’s personal attorney with his duty to the system of justice and to the entire country — should resign. Full Story

Now hold on there buckaroo. Before you go gettin’ your panties in a twist, let’s set the way back machine for 1993 shall we?

In any Congressional probe of the matter, we’d suggest she call herself as the first witness–and bring along Webster Hubbell as her chief counsel.

As everyone once knew but has tried to forget, Mr. Hubbell was a former partner of Mrs. Clinton at the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock who later went to jail for mail fraud and tax evasion. He was also Bill and Hillary Clinton’s choice as Associate Attorney General in the Justice Department when Janet Reno, his nominal superior, simultaneously fired all 93 U.S. Attorneys in March 1993. Ms. Reno–or Mr. Hubbell–gave them 10 days to move out of their offices.

At the time, President Clinton presented the move as something perfectly ordinary: “All those people are routinely replaced,” he told reporters, “and I have not done anything differently.” In fact, the dismissals were unprecedented…

At the time, Jay Stephens, then U.S. Attorney in the District of Columbia, was investigating then Ways and Means Chairman Dan Rostenkowski, and was “within 30 days” of making a decision on an indictment….

Also at the time, allegations concerning some of the Clintons’ Whitewater dealings were coming to a head. By dismissing all 93 U.S. Attorneys at once, the Clintons conveniently cleared the decks to appoint “Friend of Bill” Paula Casey as the U.S. Attorney for Little Rock. Ms. Casey never did bring any big Whitewater indictments…
Read the Full Story

Why does it always seem that what is good for this queen goose is never quite good enough for some other lowly gander? Is it just us, or does the name Marie Antoinette come to mind when thinking of Hillary Clinton? Hypocrisy should be this woman’s middle name.

It seems that the best way to handle Bubba and his philandering ways is to sidestep that whole “blowjob in the oval office” thing. Why talk about Hillary and her involvement in Whitewater? Nix on that. Stay on message.

“Will President Clinton be a drag on the campaign?”
“Of course not,” is the prescribed answer. “Americans give President Clinton very high ratings and he is one of the most respected and beloved leaders in the world.” The response is followed by highlights of the ex-president’s term in office.
Another question asks, “How do you combat Clinton fatigue, or those who say they don’t want the drama of the Clintons again?”
Answer: “A lot of Americans will gladly take the eight great years of economic prosperity and peace that the Clinton Administration delivered . . . We can do this again with experienced leaders like Hillary at the helm.”
And still another asks, “Isn’t she too polarizing to win?
Answer: “Obviously not, since she’s already winning! If you look at the polls from the past weekend, she’s ahead in both the primary and the general election races.”
Full Story

These are just some of the scripted answers The New York Post has uncovered from the Clinton campaign. So make a list, and the next time you see a Clintonista talking head on TV, see how how close to the script they stay. Maybe you could make a drinking game out of it. Say everytime one of them says “experience”, “leadership”, or “know how”, you take a drink. Bottoms Up!

Hillary came out to try and defend her husband’s inept effort to protect the U.S. from terrorism and UBL. Hillary stood tall for her man, and defended his actions. Now where have we heard say things like this before? Hmmmmmm….let’s see….Oh Yeah, here we go:

“I do believe that this is a battle,” the first lady said.

“Look at the very people who are involved in this. They have popped up in other settings. The great story here for anybody willing to find it, write about it and explain it is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president,” Mrs. Clinton said.

The first lady called the sex and perjury allegations swirling around her husband part of an effort “to undo the results of two elections.”Source

Well we all know how that little Monica Lewinsky thing turned out don’t we Hillary?

So let’s come back to the present, and Hillary’s comments today.

“I think my husband did a great job in demonstrating that Democrats are not going to take these attacks,” Hillary Clinton said. “I’m certain that if my husband and his national security team had been shown a classified report entitled ‘Bin Laden Determined To Attack Inside the United States’ he would have taken it more seriously than history suggests it was taken by our current president and his national security team.”
Source

Okay, let’s review the truth shall we Hillary? Let’s see exactly what your husband said on Fox News:

Bill Clinton on Fox News Sunday:

And you ask me about terror and Al Qaeda with that sort of dismissive thing? When all you have to do is read Richard Clarke’s book to look at what we did in a comprehensive, systematic way to try to protect the country against terror.
Source

The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon The United States - Richard Clarke - March 24, 2004

Despite our inability to locate Usama bin Ladin in one place long enough to launch an attack, I urged that we engage in a bombing campaign of al Qida facilities in Afghanistan. That option was deferred by the Principals Committee. Source

Transcript: Wednesday’s 9/11 Commission Hearings
FDCH E-Media
Wednesday, March 24, 2004; 7:00 PM

GORTON: In August of 1998, did you recommend a longer-lasting military response or just precisely the one that, in fact, took place?
CLARKE: I recommended a series of rolling attacks against the infrastructure in Afghanistan. Every time they would rebuild it, I proposed that we blow it up again much like, in fact, we were doing in Iraq, where we had a rolling series of attacks on their air defense system.
Gorton: And shortly after that, you came up with the so-called Delenda Plan, as I understand it. And is our staff report accurate in saying that it had four principle approaches — diplomacy, covert action, various financial members and military action? Is that a reasonable summary?
CLARKE: Yes, sir.
GORTON: Also, is our staff accurate in saying that the strategy was never formally adopted, but that you were authorized in effect to go ahead with the first three, but not with the fourth?
CLARKE: Yes, sir.
GORTON: And at various times thereafter you did recommend specific military responses under specific circumstances, did you not?
CLARKE: Yes, sir.
GORTON: Each of which was rejected for one reason or another?
CLARKE: That’s correct.
Source

Using lies to defend your husband’s lies? WRONG then Hillary! WRONG now!

But we do thank you for giving birth to the VRWC on January 27th, 1998.