Just Say No To Hillary Clinton

We could go on for days about how the liberal media and the Far Left swept Sandy Berger’s lying, stealing, and some would say, outright treason, under the rug. It would be laughable if it wasn’t so commonplace. The facts remain: He stole classified documents and destroyed them to protect somebody! And now he’s one of Hillary’s advisors? Are you kidding us?

Sandy Berger, who stole highly classified terrorism documents from the National Archives, destroyed them and lied to investigators, is now an adviser to presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Berger, who was fired from John Kerry’s presidential campaign when the scandal broke in 2004, has assumed a similar role in Clinton’s campaign, even though his security clearance has been suspended until September 2008. This is raising eyebrows even among Clinton’s admirers.
Source

And yet, millions of blind sheep want this woman to be President. It boggles the mind!

Why else would she make a statement like this to General Petraeus?

“Despite what I view is your rather extraordinary efforts in your testimony both yesterday and today,” said Clinton, “I think that the reports that you provide to us really require a willing suspension of disbelief.”

How much hubris must one have to challenge a General of Petraeus’ standing and knowledge? It’s blatantly obvious that Hill has become a participant in MoveOn’s blackmail scheme. Why else would she refrain from supporting Senator Cornyn’s resolution condemning MoveOn’s slanderous ad in the New York Slimes? She and the rest of the Democan’ts refused to support the measure, and it failed to come up for a binding vote. If it had, then there would have been more of a record of this shameless act by Hillary and her thieving pals. (Just because we haven’t mentioned the whole Hsu affair, does not mean we are not aware of it )

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, introduced a Senate resolution Tuesday condemning MoveOn.org’s recent attack on Gen. David Petraeus in a New York Times advertisement. The move comes the same day the top U.S. general in Iraq is set to testify before key Senate committees.

The measure was offered as a nonbinding amendment to the transportation appropriations bill currently on the floor, and but was ruled “not germane” and will not be put to a vote.
Source

Bravo to Rudy Giuliani for slamming her in on the radio,

“Hillary Clinton, questioning Gen. (David) Petraeus, said you had to suspend disbelief,” Giuliani said after a brief campaign stop at an Akron restaurant. “Why would you say that about an American general?”

He made his point, but we think he should have gone further. Let’s hope he’s saving it for their first debate…

Blah, blah, blah, or if we knew how to type the old teacher speak from the Peanuts cartoons, we do that. lately, every time Hillary opens up her mouth, she talks more and says less. We don’t think it is actually possible, but if she ever deviates from her prepared “Liberal/Democrat/no I’m a moderate… no really I am” talking points; her head just may implode from the sucking vortex that exists inside her vapid head.
With such a keen insight on what this country really needs, it’s no wonder the country is rallying around her for 2008…

“We’ve done some things right,” the New York senator said at a community event in Schenectady. “Obviously we’ve beefed up airport security in some ways, but as we’ve learned over the last week not in every way that matters. We still have not done what we need to do to protect our ports, our borders, our bridges, our transit systems, our rail lines, it’s a long list.”

“I don’t think our long-term strategy for homeland security is yet what it needs to be,” she said….

Full Story

Before she voted against it in the media of course. Oh, the hypocrisy. We do believe that if Hillary had 8 sides to her mouth, she could talk out of all of them simultaneously, all the while saying something different.

Hillary Clinton, Charles Schumer Voted to Slash NYC Terror Funds

Senators Hillary Clinton and Charles Schumer have been complaining for a week now about an $80 million cutback in New York City’s anti-terrorism funding by the Department of Homeland Security.

But it turns out that they both voted to make substantial cuts in the city’s terrorism funding last year.

According to Newsday, the Democratic duo backed a $95 million cut last December in funding from the Centers for Disease Control for bioterrorism programs around the nation. Of that amount, approximately $3 million would have gone directly to New York City.

Full Story

See for yourself. Click Here.